On Air Now

Listen Now

Weather

clear-day
69°
Clear
H 74° L 55°
  • clear-day
    69°
    Current Conditions
    Clear. H 74° L 55°
  • clear-night
    62°
    Evening
    Clear. H 74° L 55°
  • clear-day
    56°
    Morning
    Mostly Sunny. H 77° L 57°
Listen
Pause
Error

The latest newscast

00:00 | 00:00

Listen
Pause
Error

The latest traffic report

00:00 | 00:00

Listen
Pause
Error

The latest forecast

00:00 | 00:00

National Govt & Politics
House impeachment inquiry becomes teachable moment across US
Close

House impeachment inquiry becomes teachable moment across US

House impeachment inquiry becomes teachable moment across US
Photo Credit: AP Photo/Allen G. Breed
Joseph Tucker watches as Makizah Cotton makes an argument in civics class at Chatham Central High School in Bear Creek, N.C., on Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2019. The 10th-graders were debating whether President Trump should be impeached. (AP Photo/Allen G. Breed)

House impeachment inquiry becomes teachable moment across US

The 10th graders in Aedrin Albright's civics class at a rural North Carolina high school had done their homework, and now it was time to decide: Should President Donald Trump be impeached?

The students dragged their chairs across the room, those who opposed removing Trump from office on one side, those in favor on the other. Undecided students were in the middle.

"Your job is to try to persuade your classmates in here to come to your side, to your understanding," Albright told the teenagers at Chatham Central High School.

The House impeachment inquiry into Trump's dealings with Ukraine has become a teachable moment in classrooms around the country as educators incorporate the events often hundreds of miles away in Washington into their lesson plans.

They are using the debate in Congress to teach students about the Constitution and presidential power, provide history lessons about earlier impeachment cases and hold mock votes that mirror the divisions in American politics.

In Albright's first class on impeachment in October, students read articles and then drew posters explaining the process without getting into the politics. That changed on Tuesday, when the students took sides, coincidentally as House Democrats were releasing transcripts of closed-door testimony in the impeachment probe.

Like many members of Congress who will decide the Republican president's fate, most of the students in Albright's class had already made up their minds and wouldn't be swayed.

The tally at the start of class Tuesday: 15 against impeachment, three for and 10 undecided. The six precincts in Bear Creek, where the school is located, voted almost 55 percent for Trump in the 2016 presidential election, while Chatham County went for Democrat Hillary Clinton. Both candidates were represented in campaign signs hanging in the classroom.

"The Democrats have just been slamming Trump and trying to find every little thing, ever since he got into office," student Bryce Hammer said. "Just to try and get a reason just to kick him out and impeach him."

Arguing for impeachment, Makizah Cotton said Congress needs to keep a close watch on Trump. "I'm not saying he's a monarch or anything," she said. "But they (the founding fathers) knew one day maybe a monarch would happen. And they don't want that. So, I think that we shouldn't let anything go. And that's with any president."

Emma Preston was undecided. "How many months does he have until the next election? Not that many," she said. "So, if we're just going to sit here and have this argument until the next election, it's a waste of time. There shouldn't be an impeachment process going on when there's about to be a reelection."

Albright said she has included impeachment in her lesson plans for all the 18 years that she's taught civics.

For teachers who don't regularly include impeachment in their curriculum, The Choices Program at Brown University and the Penn Graduate School of Education are among those organizations that provide online lesson plans.

Teaching impeachment while Congress is investigating charges against the sitting president is a unique opportunity for teachers and students, said Sigal Ben-Porath, education professor at Penn.

"Make time for it, even if it's not on your lesson plan," she said.

Ground your students in constitutional and procedural facts and then "get the students speaking," she said. "The best way for people to learn from such events is to be active. They have to be talking, saying their views, discussing their views, arguing their views."

That includes understanding what is happening and why.

On the day in September when the House said it would begin a formal impeachment inquiry, teacher Mark Westpfhal at the Capitol Hill Gifted and Talented School in St. Paul, Minnesota, switched gears and put together a three-day "mini-unit" impeachment for his seventh grade American studies class.

He required his students to differentiate between what they believe and what they know. The school is located in "an extremely liberal region," he said, and most of his students support Trump's impeachment and removal from office. They were "quick to argue that he has done so many illegal things, but when I asked them to describe the things he has done and how those things violated the law, they slowed down a little," said Westpfhal, who frequently brings current events into his lesson plans. "We discussed how emotion and partisanship can dictate our views."

For teachers who want to steer clear of the controversy and politics of impeachment, "focusing on the history just feels really safe," said Emma Humphries, chief education officer at iCivics, a nonprofit that provides educational online games and lesson plans to promote civics education. "It's also critical for students understanding what impeachment is," she said.

Those discussions could include the impeachment cases against Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton.

Still, she's a "huge advocate" for discussing controversial issues in class.

"If it gets out of hand, if the kids are getting disrespectful, you have to, need to, shut it down," she said. The next day, she said, the teacher can talk about what happened and set ground rules.

She stressed the importance of communication between the teacher and parents and administrators.

But what if students ask teachers about their political views? Do they disclose them?

"It's a pedagogical choice, not an absolute right or wrong," said Paula McAvoy, co-author of "The Political Classroom" and assistant professor of social studies education at NC State University. "Sometimes, sharing your view is helpful to students, and sometimes sharing your view kills the discussion."

Albright chooses not to share her views, although some enterprising students were able to find out that she's registered as a Republican. Westpfhal doesn't discuss his views, either, although his students have searched him on Google to discover his political past, including connections to Democratic and Republican politicians and city leaders.

"I don't think it's my job as a teacher to influence them politically," Albright said. "I think it's my job to teach them the two sides, or the three sides or the four sides. So, it's not my job to say, 'Yes, he should be impeached.'"

When students ask her what she thinks, she asks them what they think.

For the debate, Albright chose the philosophical chairs format, in which students choose and argue their sides, citing pro- and anti-impeachment articles that they read. They could switch sides during the discussion, and the undecideds were encouraged to choose one.

The debate began calmly and respectfully but then got animated. Albright shushed the anti-impeachment students and reminded them to be civil. The pro-impeachment student who was speaking hadn't yielded the floor.

Before the class ended, the anti-impeachment side had attracted three more students, while one student had joined her pro-impeachment classmates. Six students remained undecided.

Overall, the discussion went well, Albright said. She was especially pleased that students cited source material.

"I have hope," she said. "These kids give me hope, every day."

___

Follow Martha Waggoner on Twitter at http://twitter.com/mjwaggonernc

Read More

The Latest Headlines You Need To Know

  • More than a dozen New York police officers were hurt in an overnight blaze in the city's Bronx borough, authorities said early Wednesday. >> Read more trending news  According to WPIX and WNBC, the fire began about 11 p.m. Tuesday at a Baychester Avenue apartment building. The 100-plus firefighters who responded had the blaze under control within one hour, officials said. As flames rose from the building's second and third stories, police officers knocked on residents' doors to make sure everyone had made it out safely, WPIX reported. Fourteen of the officers were hurt and treated for smoke inhalation, authorities said. WPIX reported that two residents 'sustained minor injuries' in the blaze. In a tweet, police Chief of the Department Terence Monahan praised the officers who rushed into the apartment building. 'Thankfully, nobody was seriously injured,' Monahan said. 'It's courageous acts like this that earn our officers the name -- NY's Finest.' Investigators are still trying to determine what caused the fire. Read more here or here.
  • An Ohio woman admitted to killing her three sons and was sentenced to 37 years to life in prison after pleading guilty during a hearing Tuesday in Logan County Common Pleas Court. >> Read more trending news  Brittany Pilkington, of Bellefontaine, pleaded guilty to one count of involuntary manslaughter and two counts of murder as part of a plea deal. A recommended sentencing of 37 years to life was approved. Pilkington was sentenced to 15 years to life for each count of murder and seven years for involuntary manslaughter. Her defense team said test results showed Pilkington’s brain has damage from severe abuse and childhood lead poisoning. Logan County Prosecutor Eric Stewart also addressed the court, saying he considered what her sons would want him to say for them. “I can’t even imagine what they’d want me to say,” he said. Pilkington was accused of smothering her three sons, Niall, Gavin and Noah, to death over a 13-month period. Niall, 3 months, died in July 2014; Gavin, 4, died in April 2015; and Noah, 3 months, died in August 2015.
  • A Mississippi mother and her boyfriend have been charged with capital murder in what police are calling the 'suspicious' death of a 13-month-old child.  >> Read more trending news  The incident happened at the Southern Inn and Suites on Hamilton Road in Southaven on Sept. 25, according to Maj. Wayne Perkins with the Southaven Police Department. Detectives began investigating the child's death and called for toxicology reports on the deceased child. They received those reports Monday.  With this new evidence, 18-year-old Kentavia Chapman and her boyfriend, 37-year-old Pierre Jarrell, were both charged with capital murder Monday, authorities said. Chapman and Jarrell were originally charged with felony child abuse in September.  Jarrell also was charged with two counts of felony possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute.
  • A Georgia sheriff's deputy was shot and killed Tuesday night in Augusta, authorities confirmed. >> Read more trending news  The Richmond County deputy, narcotics investigator Cecil Ridley, was fatally injured at 12th Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard in Augusta, Sheriff’s Office Sgt. William McCarty confirmed to AJC.com. The deputy was conducting proactive patrols to curb gun violence in the area, which began last week, McCarty said. At some point, Ridley encountered a suspect and gunfire was exchanged. It’s unclear what led to the shooting. The suspect was also shot and taken to Augusta University Medical Center, McCarty said. The suspect’s condition is unknown. The GBI confirmed on Twitter it is responding to an officer-involved shooting involving the Richmond County Sheriff’s Office. No other information has been released. The Richmond deputy is the seventh Georgia law enforcement officer to die in the line of duty in 2019, according to the Officer Down Memorial Page, which tracks deaths throughout the nation.  Ridley is the 108th officer killed in the line of duty this year, according to the database. He was 51 and lived in Augusta, address records show. It’s unclear how long Ridley worked at the Sheriff’s Office, but he received an award in 2018 for five years of service. This is the 77th officer-involved shooting investigation the GBI has opened this year. The 76th investigation was prompted by a shooting in Monroe on Monday night after an altercation at a hotel, AJC.com previously reported. A man was shot twice by police after he allegedly refused officers’ commands and accelerated a Jeep. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution also tracks officer-involved shootings that don't involve the GBI, and those numbers sometimes differ from the GBI's tally. – Visit AJC.com for the latest on this developing story.
  • From now through the end of December, Central Floridians can head to Lake County and ride The Polar Express. The Polar Express Train Ride is licensed by Warner Bros. and features a musical, theatrical recreation of a Christmas movie favorite. The ride began on Friday, Nov. 15 and runs to Dec. 30 out of the Tavares train station at Wooton Park in Tavares. The ride’s website says, “You will have your golden ticket punched by the conductor, experience the dancing chefs who will serve cocoa and a tasty treat, interact with the hobo and other characters from the movie, along with enjoying a reading of the classic children’s book THE POLAR EXPRESS™ by Chris Van Allsburg.” Tickets for the ride tart at $48 for weekday coach passes and go up to $$88 for first-class weekend tickets. CLICK HERE for more info and to purchase tickets.

Washington Insider

  • After hearing Tuesday from three people who listened in on President Trump's July 25 phone call with the leader of Ukraine, lawmakers will take testimony from U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, who helped to coordinate efforts in Ukraine with President Donald Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani. Sondland will certainly have to address a phone call he supposedly made from a restaurant in Ukraine - on an unsecured cell phone - where he spoke to President Trump, who made clear he wanted to know if Ukraine was going to announce it had started investigations into the Bidens, and a 2016 conspiracy theory that Ukraine - and not Russia - had hacked Democrats during the elections. “Ambassador Sondland is a big personality,” said former U.S. special envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker, who testified a day earlier. Follow along with developments here: - 11:45 am. The GOP response in the hearing (and outside) is that President Trump never directly told Sondland to do anything. Q: The President never told you about pre-conditions for a White House meeting. Sondland: 'Personally, no.' 11:30 am.  President Trump is now 45 minutes behind schedule for his departure from the White House.  He is headed today to Texas. 11:25 am.  Nunes starts the GOP time by focusing not on anything Sondland said in his testimony so far today, focusing on Republican allegations that Ukraine was 'out to get him' during the 2016 elections. First question from Nunes on this line. Sondland: 'I am not aware of it.' Nunes keeps going with more. Sondland: 'I am not aware of it.' 11:20 am.  During the break, Democrats went to the TV cameras stationed outside.  11:15 am.  Again in this impeachment hearing process, viewers on Fox News are getting some different messages. 11:00 am.  A light moment in the hearing, as Sondland says he and President Trump tend to communicate with words that probably aren't for kids. 10:47 am.  On the Drudge Report.  It's not the greatest of headlines for the President on what's usually a favorable website. 10:45 am. Sondland said the President and Giuliani wanted Ukraine to publicly announce the Burisma / Bidens / Crowdstrike-2016 investigations. But Sondland says that doesn't mean Ukraine actually had to undertake the investigations. 10:35 am.  Critics of the President in Congress say the testimony today from Sondland is a big, big deal. 10:20 am. Sondland says Secretary of State Pompeo was up to date with the Giuliani/Trump efforts all along. Sondland says he raised the delay in aid with Vice President Pence on September 1.  10:15 am.  Sondland has finished with his opening statement.  There is a lot of explosive testimony there, especially Sondland saying that 'everyone was in the loop' about the President seeking investigations from Ukraine. 10:05 am.  Was there a quid pro quo involving Ukraine?  Sondland says, in one sense, the answer is yes. 10:00 am.  Sondland says he was surprised to see the rough transcript of the July 25 call the President had with the leader of Ukraine, because he had not been told about the fact that President Trump mentioned investigations related to Biden/Burisma/Crowdstrike in the call. 9:50 am.  Sondland repeatedly says that State Department officials wanted no part of Giuliani being involved in diplomatic work.  But the President did.  So, they had to play the hand they were dealt (Sondland's description). 9:40 am.  Democrats immediately seize on the 'quid pro quo' description by Sondland.  9:27 am.  Sondland uses the term “quid pro quo” to describe what was going on at three different points in his prepared testimony. 9:25 am.  Sondland will also show that Vice President Pence was in that loop as well. 9:20 am.  Sondland says multiple times - “Everyone was in the loop.” 9:15 am.  Sondland says it has been difficult to come up with answers because the White House and State Department have not helped him get documents and phone records. 9:10 am.  The hearing is underway.  Sondland's statement is going to provide some interesting moments in questioning from both parties.  Here is the Ambassador's recount of the July 26 unsecured cell call to President Trump from a restaurant in Kyiv. 9:00 am - The opening statement of Sondland is now available at the following link. 8:40 am.  Someone asked me on Facebook what the advantage is of actually being in the hearing room.  In one way, it is being a witness to history.  But not seeing the TV feed could put you at a disadvantage, as many others watch every facial twitch, frown, and smile on the faces of the witnesses and lawmakers.  When I got here into the room this morning, I found the still photographers had taken my power plug spot, and a TV crew has taken my audio feed. So, I had to deal with that, and switch things around. If I were back in my booth in either the House or Senate side of the Capitol, everything would be just fine. I could stand, go to the bathroom, have lunch,  etc.  Here is my “view” of the dais. 8:10 am.  The folks at Fox and Friends do not buy the testimony that President Trump talks loud and could be overheard on his cell phone. 8:00 am.  A reminder of the testimony so far, is that Sondland called up President Trump from a restaurant in Ukraine, and spoke to him on an unsecured cell phone.  In that call, US embassy staffer David Holmes testified that he could easily hear the President's voice, and hear what was being discussed with Sondland - investigations - which Mr. Trump wanted from the Ukraine government. The Holmes testimony can be found at this link. 7:50 am.  The Sondland phone call with President Trump is going to get a lot of attention today - and rightfully so. 7:45 am.  Most readers probably know Sondland's name from the impeachment / Ukraine controversy, but don't really know all of the details.  There's some interesting stuff which has GOP lawmakers a bit uneasy, because the script today may not be that obvious at first. 7:35 am.  It's not just Gordon Sondland testifying today, starting at 9 am.  And there is another hearing on Thursday.  Like Tuesday, it would be no surprise for me if the hearings are still going at 8 pm - which is when the Democratic debate in Atlanta is set to begin.  That would a split screen political Super Bowl.