ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

partly-cloudy-tstorms-day
90°
Mostly Cloudy
H 85° L 77°
  • partly-cloudy-tstorms-day
    90°
    Current Conditions
    Mostly Cloudy. H 85° L 77°
  • cloudy-day
    85°
    Evening
    Mostly Cloudy. H 85° L 77°
  • cloudy-day
    78°
    Morning
    Mostly Cloudy. H 91° L 76°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest newscast

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest traffic report

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest forecast

00:00 | 00:00

Consumer Advice
Today's Headlines: Should the US Ban Credit Card Surcharges?
Close

Today's Headlines: Should the US Ban Credit Card Surcharges?

Today's Headlines: Should the US Ban Credit Card Surcharges?
Photo Credit: LDProd
Female payment electronic reader close-up shop plastique card button

Today's Headlines: Should the US Ban Credit Card Surcharges?

MoneyTips


Who's For Paying More?

Let's take a quick vote. How many consumers are in favor of surcharges just for the convenience of using a credit card? Anybody? That's what we thought.

The European Union and the United Kingdom agree with that assessment. New rules from the British government will soon prohibit retailers from charging customers extra for paying for their purchase with a credit card. The UK rule stems from an EU directive set to take effect on January 13, 2018, and, according to the UK Treasury Ministry, British consumers could save a sizable portion of the millions of pounds spent annually on card surcharges.

Calling credit card surcharges "rip-off charges", Economic Secretary to the Treasury Stephen Barclay said that such charges "have no place in a modern Britain." Do they have a place in a modern America? Some states already say no, but the situation is not straightforward – and, despite Barclay's comment, lack of surcharges does not guarantee lower prices to consumers.


Variations on the Theme

Currently, Puerto Rico and ten states do not allow credit card surcharges (California, New York, Kansas, Florida, Maine, Connecticut, Texas, Oklahoma, Massachusetts, and Colorado). Merchants in the other states are generally allowed to pass on a surcharge that is equal to their costs associated with accepting the card (up to 4%). Surcharges on debit cards are already banned throughout the US via an amendment to the Dodd-Frank legislation.

However, each card network has a specific set of surcharging requirements that retailers must follow in order to apply surcharges using that card brand. Combine different card requirements with differing state rules and you can see why relations between retailers, banks, credit card companies, and the credit card processors are complex and tense.

For example, the American Express guideline does not allow retailers to charge a higher fee for one card network (swipe fee) compared to another. This is troublesome because fees are not the same among all card networks, and merchants are then limited to passing on only the lowest rate — or refusing to take cards with higher rates altogether.

Retailers can get around this by applying product level surcharges (types of cards) instead of brand-level surcharges, but the situation remains complex. They must still abide by any state laws and limits/restrictions imposed by each card network, post an appropriate notice of the surcharge within their store, and include the surcharge amount as a separate line item on the receipt.



There's Always a Way

What about states where surcharges are not allowed? In many of these states, merchants are permitted to offer discounts for using cash or debit cards – thus the standard price is raised to cover the cost of credit card processing.

The Supreme Court recently addressed a New York case challenging the execution of this approach, ruling that state law may be challenged with respect to the way prices are advertised on free speech grounds. New York state law allows that a merchant can advertise an item for a specific cash price (for example, $5) and a specific credit card price (for example, $5.10), or advertise the item for $5.10 with a 10 cent cash discount – but the merchant can't advertise a $5 item and a 2% surcharge for credit.

Of course, retailers are welcome to raise prices straightaway without explanation and charge the same price to every one regardless of payment type. They risk losing business in doing so, but each merchant must do the risk/reward calculation.

In short, if the US bans credit card surcharges nationwide, retailers can — and almost certainly will — continue to find ways to recoup their costs. What can change, however, is making these costs fully transparent, so consumers can decide which cards best meet their needs. The free market should take care of the rest.


The Takeaway

Nobody wants to pay extra fees on their credit card transactions, and it's laudable that the EU and UK are trying to protect their consumers from such fees. But it is naïve for them to assume that by removing card fees, merchants will mostly absorb the costs of processing credit cards, and not pass those costs on to consumers in other ways. We remain skeptical.

Your job as a savvy consumer is to consider all fees and taxes before making a purchase, regardless of what you are buying and where you are buying it. This is not always easy – especially if you are buying an airline ticket or booking a hotel online – but you can't truly comparison-shop until you understand the total costs associated with your purchase.

New regulations may make your job of assessing costs a bit easier, but they have an equal chance of making it harder. In either case, it's still your responsibility to shop wisely for credit products, comparing features, benefits — and costs — on an apple-to-apple basis.

If you want more credit, check out MoneyTips' list of credit card offers.


Photo ©iStockphoto.com/LDProd

Originally Posted at: https://www.moneytips.com/todays-headlines-should-the-us-ban-credit-card-surcharges/560

Credit Card Fees Consumers May Not Know About

Many Credit Cards Drop International Fees

The True Cost of Your Credit Cards

Read More
VIEW COMMENTS

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post your thoughts. or Register.

The Latest Headlines You Need To Know

  • President Donald Trump told reporters Wednesday that Russia is no longer targeting the United States, just days after his director of National Intelligence issued a statement warning of the country’s “ongoing, pervasive efforts to undermine our democracy.” >> Read more trending news “Thank you very much. No,” Trump answered after a reporter asked during a Cabinet meeting Wednesday if Russia was still targeting the U.S. “We are doing very well, probably as well as anybody has ever done with Russia,” Trump said. “There's been no president ever as tough as I have been on Russia.” Trump’s comment came just days after National Intelligence Director Dan Coats said in a statement that intelligence officials “have been clear in our assessments of Russia meddling in the 2016 election” and the ongoing efforts to interfere in American politics. >> From Cox Media Group’s Jamie Dupree: Trump again contradicts U.S. Intelligence on Russia Wednesday’s comments marked the second time in less than a week that the president has contradicted his intelligence officials while talking about Russia. He told reporters on Tuesday that he “misspoke” one day earlier when, during a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, he said that he didn’t see why Russia would have meddled in the election. “In a key sentence in my remarks I said the word ‘would’ instead of ‘wouldn’t,’” Trump told reporters Tuesday. “The sentence should have been ‘I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia.’ ... I accept our intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election took place.” However, he added, it “could be other people also.” >> Trump says he accepts that Russia meddled in 2016 election The president reiterated that his campaign had no involvement in the election meddling. Former FBI Director Robert Mueller was tasked in May 2017 with investigating Russian election interference and its possible ties to Trump and his campaign officials. The special counsel investigation of Russian meddling has led to charges against 32 people accused of crimes ranging from money laundering and falsifying income tax returns to lying to FBI investigators.  >> More on Robert Mueller's investigation Five people, including former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, have pleaded guilty to charges in the investigation. The investigation is ongoing.
  • For the second time this week, President Donald Trump publicly went against the findings of the U.S. Intelligence Community with respect to Russian efforts to undermine election activities in the United States, as the President shot down a question about whether Russia was still engaged in activities like their 2016 interference in the U.S. elections. “Is Russia still targeting the U.S.?” a reporter asked, as the President wrapped up a Cabinet meeting at the White House. “Thank you very much. No,” President Trump said firmly as he shook his head, giving an answer that again runs counter to what American intelligence agencies have been warning for months, that Russia is looking for a repeat of their 2016 interference efforts. BREAKING: Asked if Russia is still targeting US, Trump says 'no,' contradicting election warnings from intelligence chief — AP Politics (@AP_Politics) July 18, 2018 'No,” President Trump says when asked if Russia is targeting the US https://t.co/eszpyDpaDt — CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) July 18, 2018 In brief remarks to reporters, the President said several times that he has been tough on Russia. “There’s never been a President as tough on Russia as I have been,” Mr. Trump told reporters. “And I think President Putin knows that better than anybody, especially the media.” On Monday, after Mr. Trump had seemingly sided with the denial of Vladimir Putin at a joint news conference in Finland, the Director of National Intelligence, Dan Coats, quickly issued a statement reiterating that the U.S. firmly believes Russia meddled in the 2016 election, noting “their ongoing, pervasive efforts to undermine our democracy.” Mr. Trump then clarified his comments on Tuesday, in a statement read to reporters – but Wednesday’s remarks seemed to take him back to square one – where the President argues that the Russians are not coming after the U.S. The President’s answer puts him squarely at odds as well with many in both parties in the Congress, who fully believe that Russia is still actively engaged in efforts to meddle with the 2018 and 2020 elections in the United States. A BIG discrepancy between President Trump’s statement and DNI Coates’ warning. It’s imperative we get to the bottom of what is going on so we can be prepared to protect ourselves in advance of the 2018 elections. My personal view: the Russians are at again. — Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) July 18, 2018 “OMG. OMG. OMG,” wrote Michael Hayden on Twitter, a former Director of the CIA and National Security Agency. “Mr. President. Walk this back too,” said Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer.
  • The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs accused the FBI of “implementing a political put-up job” after authorities arrested a Russian national over the weekend on allegations that she illegally acted as an unregistered foreign agent. >> Read more trending news Authorities on Sunday arrested Mariia Butina, a 29-year-old Russian citizen living in Washington, D.C., on suspicion of “conspiracy to act as an agent of the Russian Federation within the United States without prior notification to the Attorney General,” according to the Justice Department. In a criminal complaint released Monday, authorities accused Butina of failing to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. >> From Cox Media Group’s Jamie Dupree: Russian woman arrested, charged with illegal political activities in U.S. In a pair of tweets attributed Wednesday to Maria Zakharova, director of the Information and Press Department for Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the foreign ministry wrote that officials were dismayed to learn of Butin’s arrest. “We are dismayed by the reported arrest of Russian citizen Maria Butina in the US on July 15,” Zakharova said, using an alternative spelling of Butina’s first name. “It looks as if the FBI, instead of carrying out their responsibility of fighting crime, is implementing a political put-up job set to it by forces that are whipping up anti-Russia hysteria in the US.” Justice Department officials allege that Butina schmoozed with influential people and organizations in the U.S. in order to advance the interests of Russia. “From as early as 2015 and continuing through at least February 2017, Butina worked at the direction of a high-level official in the Russian government who was previously a member of the legislature of the Russian Federation and later became a top official at the Russian Central Bank,” Justice Department officials said Monday in a news release.  >> Who is Mariia Butina, the woman charged with acting as a Russian agent in the US? Authorities added that the unnamed official was among the 24 Russian oligarchs and senior Russian government officials sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury Department for profiting from the country’s illegal and subversive activities in the U.S. and abroad.  Butina was scheduled to appear in court Wednesday for a hearing. Prosecutors are expected to argue that the 29-year-old should be held without bail ahead of trial because she is a flight risk, NPR reported.
  • Orlando police are investigating the death of a toddler, investigators said. Police arrived Wednesday at about 6:30 a.m. at a home on Bethune Drive in the Washington Shores neighborhood. Neither the cause of death nor the child’s name have been released. WFTV.com will update this story as it develops. Other Florida stories: Florida college student saves mom's life before dying in crash Missing Florida toddler found dead in backyard canal Girl says man tried to kidnap her while walking near Mount Dora
  • President Donald Trump has confirmed reports of major updates to Air Force One. In an interview with CBS News Tuesday, he said the plane will have changes inside and out, including a bolder paint scheme. “Boeing gave us a good deal. And we were able to take that,” Trump said. “But I said, ‘I wonder if we should use the same baby blue colors?’ And we’re not. Red, white and blue.” >> Read more trending news  On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Defense announced the $3.9 billion contract with Seattle-based The Boeing Company for the manufacturing and engineering of two aircraft. “Air Force One is going to be incredible,” Trump said. “It’s gonna be the top of the line. The top in the world and it’s gonna be red, white and blue, which I think is appropriate.” Trump added that the contract was a good deal, saying he saved $1.5 billion. The Associated Press reported in February that the price includes work to modify two 747-800 commercial planes with equipment needed for the presidential aircraft, such as a secure communications suite, self-defense system, medical facility and electrical power upgrades. It will also include work to build and develop the two planes. “Boeing is proud to build the next generation of Air Force One, providing American presidents with a flying White House at outstanding value to taxpayers,” the company said in a statement Feb. 27. “President Trump negotiated a good deal on behalf of the American people.” Work on the aircraft will be performed in San Antonio, Texas, and is expected to be completed by December 2024. “I hate to say this, it’s gonna be a long time,” Trump told CBS News. “It’s a very complex project. But by the time it gets built, you're gonna have many presidents, hopefully, use it and enjoy it.”