H 96° L 73°
  • clear-day
    Current Conditions
    Sunny. H 96° L 73°
  • clear-day
    Sunny. H 96° L 73°
  • cloudy-day
    Partly Cloudy. H 96° L 73°

The latest newscast

00:00 | 00:00


The latest traffic report

00:00 | 00:00


The latest forecast

00:00 | 00:00

National Govt & Politics
Trump signs revised, more limited executive order on foreign travel to U.S.

Trump signs revised, more limited executive order on foreign travel to U.S.

Trump signs revised, more limited executive order on foreign travel to U.S.
Photo Credit: Jamie Dupree

Trump signs revised, more limited executive order on foreign travel to U.S.

With his original executive order on travel and immigration stymied in the courts, President Donald Trump on Monday set out a new plan to again limit visitors from certain countries, and step up reviews on refugees coming into the United States, with the details changed in a number of ways to ensure that it can pass legal muster in the weeks and months ahead.

The revised plan puts a 90 day hold on new travel from six Muslim-majority countries designated as posing a national security risk, temporarily suspends the refugee admissions program for 120 days, and sets in motion a series of efforts to improve the screening of refugees and other travelers who want to come to the U.S.

It would take effect in ten days, on March 16.

"This is not a Muslim ban in any way, shape, or form," said a senior administration official in a morning press call with reporters.

The changes from the original executive order include:

+ The ban on new travelers from a group of majority-Muslim nations will no longer include Iraq. There will still be a suspension on new entries from Iran, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Syria and Yemen. That means six countries are part of this added scrutiny, down from seven in the original order.

+ As part of the change involving Iraqi travelers, U.S. officials said that the Government of Iraq has agreed to enhance its travel documents and other screening of travelers, as well as agreeing to allow the United States to return nationals to Iraq if those people are determined to be a threat to security.

+ The travel changes in this revised executive order will only apply to future applicants for U.S. travel approval - in other words, anyone who already has a legal visa to enter the U.S. will be allowed to do so. "Per the Executive Order, foreign nationals from Sudan, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen who have valid visas will not be affected by this Executive Order," the administration said in a fact sheet about the changes.

+ Those people who had visas revoked when the original executive order was being enforced will have those visas and travel permissions restored. "The Department does not plan to revoke any visas provisionally due to this executive order," a State Department official said this morning.

+ The indefinite suspension of the Syrian refugee program has been dropped in the new order. "All nationalities are treated the same," an official said. "So, there is no blanket ban on Syrian refugees?" a reporter asked. "That's correct," the official replied.

+ Language in the original order that allowed a special preference for Christian refugees from Muslim-majority countries has been dropped from the new executive order. "That part of the executive does not exist in the new executive order," an administration official said.

+ The new order does not effect green card holders, legal permanent residents of the United States, people who have dual nationalities - basically anyone who has already been approved to come into the United States, they will not have those travel documents revoked by this order.

+ The order will not take effect immediately, to give time for immigration and customs personnel to be briefed on what exactly is changing. "We're going to have a very smooth implementation period," an official explained, saying there should be no immediate surge in airport stops creating what an official labeled "alleged chaos" at some airports in the U.S.

As for the legal challenges to the original executive order, a Department of Justice official said those would in a sense be "mooted" by this new order.

"The Department of Justice will be filing the appropriate briefs and letters with the courts in those existing cases," the official told reporters.

President Trump had vowed to fight on in the courts for his original order - "SEE YOU IN COURT" - but that came apart just hours after this new order was signed.

"As explained below, the New Executive Order sets forth policies substantially different from the policies in Executive Order No. 13,769," the feds wrote in a submission to federal Judge James Robart, who put the Trump plan on hold in early February.

"The New Executive Order clarifies and narrows the scope of Executive action regarding immigration, extinguishes the need for emergent consideration, and eliminates the potential constitutional concerns identified by the Ninth Circuit," the Justice Department said in a submission.

"The President has capitulated on numerous key provisions blocked by our lawsuit," said Bob Ferguson, the Attorney General of Washington State, "including bans on Green Card holders, visa holders and dual citizens, an indefinite ban on Syrian refugees, and explicit preferences based on religion."

The State of Washington's case led two court rulings against the White House, which left President Trump thoroughly frustrated in early February.

Monday's legal filings by the feds were a remarkable change from what the President had said in early February, after a three judge panel on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals had refused to allow the President's order to go into effect.

"It is thus respectfully submitted that the New EO falls outside of this Court’s injunction," the feds wrote to Judge Leonie Brinkema, who blocked the enforcement of the original order in the state of Virginia, one of multiple notices sent on Monday.

And while the White House touted the new plan, it certainly wasn't the first choice.

Here are links to the background documents distributed by the Trump Administration:

Fact Sheet on Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry

Q&A on Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry

Here is the text of the President's revised order

Implementation memo for the revised executive order

The text of the revised executive order even goes so far as to defend the original order, denying that it provided a "basis for discriminating for or against members of any particular religion."

The new order also noted the court challenges against the original Trump order as well.

c9f363e5-975b-490e-9fb0-851508bbc08d{ "/Pub/p8/CmgSharedContent/2017/03/06/Images/WPIMAGE_cmgwsbradiojamiedupree_travel22_11303.jpg?uuid=ZHeIhjTNEemxKaMrYufZxg", "", "9ee89a6bca4f4eb5a9255c0769d5f435" "image" "" }

Read More

The Latest Headlines You Need To Know

  • A frightening scene unfolded in a Central Florida neighborhood Sunday as people watched a man allegedly force a woman and a baby into a car. >> Read more trending news  That man was arrested after police said he kidnapped his girlfriend and their baby around 2:30 p.m. in Orange County, then led officers on a chase. Orlando police said the chase began in the Carver Shores neighborhood and ended at South Street and Rogers Street, where the man crashed the car. A witness in the area saw the man get out of the car and believed he was surrendering, but instead he ran from police. Video the witness shot shows police and medics responding to the incident. Investigators said a witness saw the man grab his girlfriend by the hair and pull her into a car as she tried to escape several times. The man then allegedly sped off with her and their 1-year-old in the back seat. The car was later found by the Orange County Sheriff's Office helicopter. The man drove off again before he crashed into a ditch. “They were asking him to get out of the car with his hands up,” said a witness, who did not want to be identified. “He proceeded to get out of the car, seemed like he was going to put his hands up and then next thing we knew, he took off through the neighborhood.”  Police caught up to the man later and arrested him. Officers said the woman and child were not hurt.
  • As new legal battles brew over the right to abortion access nationwide, central Floridians are sharing their opinions on recently passed legislation in other states. Hundreds of people gathered Sunday at Lake Eola Park in downtown Orlando, to send a message to Florida's lawmakers.  Representatives said even though abortion restrictions have not passed the legislature this session in Florida, that doesn't mean it's not going to happen next session.  “Having such an incredible crowd here today reflects the majority of Americans supporting access to an abortion and speaks to lawmakers across the state of Florida that if you try to follow suit with Alabama, Missouri and Georgia, these folks are going to be at your office,” Rep. Anna Eskamani said.
  • A new water park is coming to Kissimmee, and you have the chance to check it out before everyone else does. The 'preview days' for Island H2O Live! which is at the Margaritaville Resort Orlando start on June 5th and last until June 20th. The water park is located just off U.S. 192 on 3230 Inspiration Drive.  During these preview days, you can get $5 off a daily pass or save $20 on an annual pass and get one for $69.99 rather than paying $89.99. Be aware that daily passes must be bought at the water park ticket windows only.  Island H2O Live! has a 'social media' theme that is integrated into the park's attractions. Like the 'Tag Shack' cocktail bar or the 'Hashtag Heights' family tube ride. It also allows you to use unique technology like waterproof wristbands that you can link to an app that allows you to interact with some of the things on certain rides. This new water park has over 20 different experiences for you and your family to check out.  Also, here's a fun fact: its located within walking distance of Sunset Walk, the resort's shopping and entertainment district, so if water parks aren't your thing or you feel like doing a little bit of shopping after taking a swim, you can do that too.  Side note: Since this is a new water park, that means of course they need people to fill up their full time positions. If that sounds interesting, you can go to the job fair on May 28th from 9am to 4pm at the water park. They say they plan to hire on the spot.  Though the preview days have been announced, there is no official start date to when the park opens. If you would like to learn more about it, you can check out the website here:  https://www.islandh2olive.com/
  • As you spend this Memorial Day weekend celebrating with your friends and family, its important to remember that the freedom many of our nation's heroes have fought and died for always comes at a price. Well in honor of the occasion, as you would expect, here are some freebies and deals through Memorial Day that veterans, active duty and retired military members and their families can take advantage of( standard disclaimer: some locations may not be participating, so its important to always contact them ahead of time):  Ace Hardware: While supplies last, you can get a free 8 by 12 inch flag on May 25th.  AAA: Through Tuesday, you can get free tipsy low service.  Apple: They have special offers on their products, including their Apple Care Protection Plans.  Cinemark Theatres: It varies by location, but if you show your military ID, you get a special discount.  Delta Airlines: Military personnel get a free bag check.  Home Depot and Lowe's: Veterans and their families get 10 percent off. Just show your ID  Hooters: Show your military ID on May 27th and you can get free entrees including 10 free boneless wings, Buffalo chicken salad, Hooters Burger or a Buffalo Chicken sandwich.  Longhorn Steakhouse: Check out the coupon below to get a free appetizer or dessert when you get an entree through May 26th.  https://www.longhornsteakhouse.com/customer-service/coupons/free-app-or-dessert-with-2-entrees-lh74-052319?cmpid=br:lh_ag:ie_ch:eml_ca:LHQ419L52COUP_dt:20190523_vs:1NV_in:Specials_pl:image01_FreeApp_rd:9bc86910b47843f7a15abeafd3d66e28  Sea World and Busch Gardens: The Waves of Honor program gives free entry to military families and members with their ID through December 31st. TGI Fridays: Check out the coupon to a free entree when you buy one and two drinks from May 25-27.  https://share.rivet.works/fridays
  • An ex-Magic Kingdom worker from Clermont has been arrested, accused of trying to set up a sexual encounter with an 8 year old girl.  According to the United States Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Florida, Frederick M. Pohl Jr.  sent inappropriate pictures of himself to what he believed was the 8 year old girl and talked online with her and her father in order to arrange a meeting. When he arrived at an Orlando hotel that they were supposed to meet at, Pohl was arrested by an undercover federal agent who was the one posing as the girl he was talking to.  According to the submitted criminal complaint, Pohl was in possession of condoms and a child sized pink dress. While the Middle District did confirm that he was an employee at the Magic Kingdom, they did not say what his role was.

Washington Insider

  • With June 4, 2019 marking the 100th anniversary of the approval by Congress of a constitutional change which guaranteed women the ability to vote in the United States, a look back at the final debates in the House and Senate showcased dire predictions that giving women the franchise would bring a rush to socialism in American and spur racial problems in the South. 'It will not only add to the growth of socialism, but will likewise contribute to the upbuilding of femininism and Bolshevism in America,' thundered Rep. Frank Clark, a Florida Democrat who bitterly opposed the women's suffrage amendment. 'Every Socialist and every Bolshevist throughout the land wherever you find him is an ardent advocate of woman suffrage, and he wants it by Federal amendment,' Clark said on the House floor, as he also warned the change would stir racial troubles in the South.  'Make this amendment a part of the Federal Constitution and the negro women of the Southern States, under the tutelage of the fast-growing socialistic element of our common country, will become fanatical on the subject of voting and will reawaken in the negro men an intense and not easily quenched desire to again become a political factor,' said Clark, who led opposition to the constitutional change. While Clark's arguments did not sway the debate, there were clear sectional differences, as the House voted 304-90 in favor of the proposed constitutional change to allow women to vote. As debate concluded in the House on May 21, 1919, supporters said it was simply time for women to be allowed to vote in every state of the Union. 'I want to congratulate the good women who fought the good fight all these years, and who now see the dawn of the day of final victory,' said Rep. Frank Mondell, the House Republican Leader from Wyoming, a state which allowed women to vote when it was still a territory. 'When I came here the voice of the suffragist was like that of John the Baptist crying in the wilderness,' said former House Speaker 'Champ' Clark, a Democrat from Missouri. 'I think my wife and my daughter are as capable of voting as most men in this country are,' the Democratic Leader said to applause. But for others, what would ultimately become the 19th Amendment - referred to in debate as the 'Susan B. Anthony Amendment' - was not something to celebrate, as many southern lawmakers eyed the effort with derision and suspicion, with the Civil War, Reconstruction, and states' rights bubbling in the political background. 'Is suffrage such a question as should be snatched from the control of the States and lodged in a rapidly centralizing government?' asked Rep. Eugene Black, a Democrat from Texas, as a number of lawmakers in both parties said the individual states should decide who votes, and who does not. 'Under the fifteenth amendment, not only the negro, for whom it was adopted, but the sons of every other race under the sun may vote in any State in the Union, provided they or their ancestors have once been naturalized,' argued Rep. Rufus Hardy, a Democrat from Texas. 'What evils may yet come of the fifteenth amendment only the future may unfold,' Hardy said, as he drew applause in advocating states' rights, and denouncing federal decisions about who could vote. 'It is a privilege to be granted or withheld at the pleasure of the States,' said Rep. Clark of Florida. But some urged southern lawmakers to reconsider, asking the 'gentlemen of Dixie' to give their mothers a chance to vote for them. Several weeks later, as the Senate vote on the 19th amendment approached in early June, the debate became more testy - more focused on race - and the right of states to determine who can vote. 'When it says that there shall be no restriction of the suffrage on account of sex, it means the female sex, and means the millions upon millions of Negro women in the South,' said Sen. Ellison Smith, a Democrat from South Carolina. The argument from southern Senators was simple - the states should decide who votes, not the federal government.  It was a preview of the battles to come during the Civil Rights era. 'Mr. President, it is not a question today as to whether the women of American should have the right to vote,' said Sen. Oscar Underwood, a Democrat from Alabama.  “It is a question of whether, in the end, our Government shall live.” Supporters of the amendment openly acknowledged that black women in the South probably would not be allowed to vote by southern states - precisely in the same way that hurdles had been placed in the way of black Americans voting in the states of the former Confederacy - a charge that left southern Senators like Smith aggravated. 'I have heard it flippantly remarked by those who propose to vote for this amendment, 'You found a way to keep the Negro man from voting and you will find away to keep the unworthy Negro woman from voting,' Smith said on the Senate floor, as he denounced how the South had been 'deluged by an alien and unfit race.' “You went specifically after the Negro men in the fifteenth amendment,” Smith said in Senate debate.  “Now you go specifically after the Negro and white women in this amendment.” On the floor, Smith and other opponents of the amendment pushed back hard on the race question, as Senators sparred over old wounds and scars left by the Fifteenth Amendment and Reconstruction. 'Those of us from the South, where the preponderance of the Negro vote jeopardized our civilization, have maintained that the fifteenth amendment was a crime against our civilization,' Smith said. 'The Senator knows full well that the fifteenth amendment embodied the color question,' said Sen. Irvine Lenroot, a Republican from Wisconsin, 'the Senator knows just as well that there is no color question at all embodied in this amendment. It relates only to sex.' 'The discussion here upon the floor yesterday makes it perfectly apparent that in part at least, in a certain section of this country, this proposed amendment will be a dead letter,' acknowledged Sen. James Wadsworth, a Republican from New York. Wadsworth and others were proven correct, as it took many years for black Americans to get around the poll tax and other means of stopping them from voting. “Oh, the white man votes because you are careful to apply tests which do not apply to the white man,' Senator William Borah, a Republican of Idaho, said to Senators from the South. 'You pick out those tests which exclude the Negro and write them into your law, and that excludes the Negro.' In an exchange with Senator John Williams, a Mississippi Democrat, Borah said, “the Negro does not vote (in the South) because he is black. That is the only crime which he has committed.” Just before the final vote in the Senate, Democrat Edward Gay of Louisiana rose on the Senate floor, making one last call to allow the states to have the final say on whether women should vote. 'I predict that there are 13 States that will never ratify the amendment which the Congress of the United State is about to present to the American people,' Gay said. Gay was wrong, as the amendment was ratified 14 months later in August of 1920. But it took years for many southern states to ratify the 19th Amendment to the Constitution: + Virginia - February 21, 1952 + Alabama - September 8, 1953 + Florida - May 13, 1969 + South Carolina - July 1, 1969 + Georgia - February 20, 1970 + Louisiana - June 11, 1970 + North Carolina - May 6, 1971 + Mississippi - March 22, 1984