ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

clear-day
76°
Mostly Cloudy
H 89° L 69°
  • clear-day
    76°
    Current Conditions
    Mostly Cloudy. H 89° L 69°
  • cloudy-day
    86°
    Evening
    Mostly Cloudy. H 89° L 69°
  • cloudy-day
    70°
    Morning
    Mostly Cloudy. H 84° L 62°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest newscast

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest traffic report

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest forecast

00:00 | 00:00

National Govt & Politics
The road to a GOP health care deal - is it really that different?
Close

The road to a GOP health care deal - is it really that different?

The road to a GOP health care deal - is it really that different?
Photo Credit: Jamie Dupree

The road to a GOP health care deal - is it really that different?

As Democrats took to the Senate floor on Monday evening to denounce closed door Republican negotiations on a GOP plan to overhaul the Obama health law, both parties traded barbs over how this bill was being put together, with Democrats once more zeroing in on a lack of public hearings, as it still wasn't clear when the full Senate would vote on the top agenda item for Republicans in 2017.

"If there is not going to be a hearing, then we shouldn't vote," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA).

In recent days, I've heard from partisans on both sides about the current situation in the Senate on health care, as Democrats denounce the GOP process, and Republicans point back to eight years ago to claim that nothing different is happening in 2017.

"Jamie, have you ever seen a bill / legislative process like this shrouded in such secrecy?" asked @wcsanders on Twitter.

Having worked my way through way too much Congressional history, I don't like to ever say that something has "never" happened before in the House or Senate - because there probably is a legislative example that we have forgotten about from many years ago.

In some ways on this GOP health care bill, we have not seen a process like this before - but in others, we certainly have. Let's take a look.

1. For the GOP health bill, a lack of Senate hearings. If there is one dramatic difference on the GOP health care bill, it is the absence of public committee hearings on various GOP proposals. Republicans in Congress have complained for the past seven years about how the Obama health law was put together in 2009 and 2010, but the process this time certainly has not had anywhere close to the number of public hearings and committee meetings that were held by Democrats on the Obama health law. Yes, the deck was stacked against the GOP back then because Democrats had 60 votes in the Senate, but that did not push most of the process behind closed doors. This time, instead of committee hearings and votes, the focus is on 13 Senate Republicans who are doing most of the work, which has led Democrats to hammer on the idea that all of the GOP health care work is being done in secret. The former Senate historian says nothing this big has been done so secretly in the Senate since World War I.

2. But let's be honest, closed door talks in Congress are not new. For all of the finger pointing from Democrats about Republicans meeting in secret on health care, let's not forget that Congress often operates behind closed doors when forging the final details of major legislation - and health care is no different. "Democratic lawmakers have yet to read the health-care bill," noted one story in the Washington Post from 2009 that Republicans happily emailed to reporters on Monday night, to make the case that Democrats made some late changes to their health plan without much in the way of any legislative spotlights on the details. It's a reminder that both parties love to talk about bipartisanship, but it's not unusual for one side to go it alone and assemble a major tax or health care bill, without the involvement of the other side.

3. So, what is different about these health talks? Like 1994 and 2009, the lead on health care is being taken by the Senate Majority Leader. George Mitchell could not put together a bipartisan plan in 1994, but Harry Reid was able to keep things together in 2009-2010. Now, Mitch McConnell is trying to shepherd a health care bill to the finish line in 2017. In terms of comparing this to Congressional history, maybe what's missing from this process is that it is not being driven by a specific committee or a powerful chairman in the House and/or Senate. So for now, there are no high stakes committee meetings where the hallways are jammed with lobbyists and reporters; instead, this GOP effort in the Senate is focused on 13 Senators of one party, meeting in the Capitol, trying to forge that agreement.

4. It's important to remember some 2009 lessons. As we wait to see how Senate Republicans might alter the House-passed health care bill, we should go back to how Democrats made late changes with their own health plan in December of 2009. A few days before approving that bill on Christmas Eve, Senate Democrats added in a 383 page amendment, which included the "Cornhusker Kickback" and other provisions. A few months later in March, House Democrats would add in 153 pages of legislative text just a few days before the final vote. The truth is, both parties excel at dropping large amounts of legislative text on lawmakers at the last minute, and asking for a vote a few days later on a major bill that most lawmakers have not read. Last minute deals were made in 2009-2010, and may be part of the deal in 2017 as well, no matter how much Democrats complain.

Jamie Dupree
Close

health102

Jamie Dupree

5. Are we really near a final Senate vote? It depends on who you talk to, but there are some Republicans who are still forecasting a final vote in the Senate by the end of next week, before lawmakers go home for a July Fourth break. One rule that won't be changed for health care is the need for a cost estimate by the Congressional Budget Office, which is mandatory before a Senate vote (but not in the House). Just like for Democrats back in 2009 and 2010, the Holy Grail is not a date certain for a vote, but when you can get a majority of votes. Republicans need 50 Senators plus the Vice President to provide the margin of victory on their health care package - which we are still waiting to read.

6. One other likely difference - a much shorter floor debate. Back in 2009, Democrats started the final push on a Senate health care bill on the Monday after Thanksgiving, and didn't stop until approval of the bill at sunrise on Christmas Eve. That was almost four weeks of time on the Senate floor, as Democrats massaged the details of the measure (and came up with changes like the Cornhusker Kickback). This time, the total debate could be no more than 20 hours of debate - the amount set forward under special expedited rules for "budget reconciliation," which does not allow for a Senate filibuster. Democrats were more than happy to remind the GOP of that extended 2009 debate, as we wait to see if there will be final action over the next ten days on a GOP health care bill - or if this spills into July.

Read More

The Latest Headlines You Need To Know

  • Former Vice President Joe Biden announced Thursday that he is running for president. >> PREVIOUS STORY: Joe Biden to announce 2020 presidential bid Thursday, reports say The Delaware Democrat made his candidacy official in an online campaign video Thursday morning.  >> Watch the video here “The core values of this nation … our standing in the world … our very democracy ... everything that has made America – America – is at stake,” Biden tweeted at 6 a.m. Thursday. “That’s why today I’m announcing my candidacy for President of the United States.” >> See the tweet here Biden also unveiled his campaign website. Check it out here.  Here are the latest updates: Update 8:24 a.m. EDT April 25: President Donald Trump responded to Biden’s announcement in a tweet Thursday morning. “Welcome to the race Sleepy Joe,” Trump tweeted. “I only hope you have the intelligence, long in doubt, to wage a successful primary campaign. It will be nasty – you will be dealing with people who truly have some very sick & demented ideas. But if you make it, I will see you at the Starting Gate!” >> See the tweet here Update 7:07 a.m. EDT April 25: Former President Barack Obama’s spokeswoman released a statement early Thursday following Biden’s announcement. “President Obama has long said that selecting Joe Biden as his running mate in 2008 was one of the best decisions he ever made,” Obama spokeswoman Katie Hill said. “He relied on the Vice President’s knowledge, insight and judgment throughout both campaigns and the entire presidency. The two forged a special bond over the last 10 years and remain close today.” >> See the statement here Meanwhile, U.S. Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., endorsed Biden in a statement. “We are at a crucial moment in our history,” Coons’ statement read. “We need leaders who will bring us together instead of tearing us apart, who will focus on the real issues facing American families, and who will restore the United States’ role in the world as a force for stability, freedom and human rights. Joe Biden is that leader, and I’m proud to endorse him for President of the United States.” >> Read the statement here U.S. Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., also endorsed Biden. “At this make-or-break moment for our middle class, our children and our workers, America needs Vice President Joe Biden to be its next President,” the statement read. “Joe Biden has spent a lifetime fighting battles on behalf of hardworking Americans while ensuring America’s values and interests are represented abroad. As both a U.S. Senator and our Vice President, he has delivered results for the middle class, kept our country safe and strengthened our standing in the world.” >> Read the full statement here Original story: A fundraiser for Biden, who is originally from Scranton, Pennsylvania, also is scheduled Thursday evening in Philadelphia, Politico reported Tuesday.  On Monday, Biden, 76, will make an appearance at a Pittsburgh union hall for his first campaign event, NBC News reported. >> Is Joe Biden running for president in 2020? Biden, who served in the U.S. Senate from 1973 to 2009, unsuccessfully sought the Democratic nomination for president in 1988 and 2008. This time, he joins a packed field of 20 Democratic candidates vying to take on Republican President Donald Trump. Biden consistently has performed well in recent polls. In a national survey of Democrats released by Monmouth University this week, Biden led the field with 27% support, The Hill reported. He's also leading the Democratic pack in the RealClearPolitics polling average, with 29% support.  >> Read more trending news  But the Monmouth poll found that Biden's favorability rating dropped from 76% in March to to 72% this month, according to The Hill. The drop came as multiple women came forward to accuse him of inappropriate contact. >> Joe Biden responds after multiple women accuse him of inappropriate behavior 'I will be more mindful and respectful of people's personal space, and that's a good thing, that's a good thing,” he said earlier this month. “I’ve worked my whole life to empower women. I've worked my whole life to prevent abuse, I've written, and so the idea that I can't adjust to the fact that personal space is important – more important than it's ever been – is just not thinkable. I will. I will.”
  • Several mail bins filled with packs of playing cards were stacked in the office of the Washington state senator who made comments about nurses playing cards on the job. According to a news release, about 1,700 decks of cards from nurses across the country were delivered to Sen. Maureen Walsh's office. Last week, Walsh, a Republican representing College Place, Washington, made the comments while debating a Senate bill that would require uninterrupted meal and rest breaks for nurses. Related: Sen. Maureen Walsh apologizes for remarks about nurses in rural hospitals 'playing cards' On Wednesday, House Bill 1155 passed the Senate and the House of Representatives.  Walsh apologized for her comments.  >> Read more trending news  “I wish I could take my words back, but the issue remains important,” she said. “Our critical access hospitals serve an important role in smaller communities across the state. Many already are operating in the red, and this could put them under.” Walsh’s office has received 10,000 emails and more than 35,000 phone calls since last Friday. More than 650,000 people signed online petitions demanding Walsh shadow a nurse for a 12-hour shift. – The Associated Press contributed to this report. 
  • Highway workers on State Road 29 near Interstate 75, in LaBelle spotted an endangered Florida panther trapped on the wrong side of the highway fence Monday. It happened near the LaBelle Nature Park.  A team of Florida Fish and Wildlife officers responded to get the big cat back to safety. Luckily the panther responded to claps and whistles from FWC Officer Rubenstein and a helpful motorist. The officers  body camera caught the whole thing on video. App users click here to watch the video. The effort was a success and the panther eventually ran through an open gate back to safety.  MYFWC posted the video on their Facebook page and one interesting response came from a Titusville man who said he saw a panther in his neighborhood  Robert Colbert said his 110 pound doberman could smell the cat and was pacing his fence line.  Colbert lives on Fox Lake rd in Titusville.
  • Supported by both President Donald Trump and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, HB 527 passed through the house Wednesday and is now up for debate in the Senate. The legislation would crackdown on cities and counties for non-cooperation with federal immigration authorities in arresting and detaining known undocumented immigrants. State officials could fine offenders up to $5,000 a day.  It is now up to the Senate to send the legislation onto the Governor’s desk. Florida’s Senate is a more moderate chamber and opponents who believe only undocumented violent offenders should be detained are expected to voice their opinions. Regardless, Republican leaders believe they have the votes to pass the law which, if signed  by  Governor DeSantis,  would take effect July 1, 2019.

Washington Insider

  • As President Donald Trump on Wednesday once more called for Congress to change America's laws dealing with illegal immigration, threatening again to close part of the Mexican border, and vowing to send more armed soldiers to help stop illegal immigrants trying to enter the United States, there was no evidence that Republicans in the Senate - or Democrats in the House - were ready to launch any legislative drive to help deal with the tide of migrants. In a speech at an opioids conference in Atlanta on Tuesday, the President again appealed for action to change what he said were 'horrible, obsolete, weak, pathetic, immigration laws.' 'And that's why I've declared a national emergency, which is exactly what it is,' Mr. Trump added. 'Our facilities are at full capacity,' Acting Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan said earlier this week, as he echoed the President's call for lawmakers to help deal with those coming across the border illegally. 'Congress must act with additional authorities, resources & tools in order to accomplish our humanitarian & security mission,' the new DHS chief tweeted. Earlier this week, the President's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, said he was putting the final touches on an immigration package to be presented to his father in coming days. But there was no indication of whether that plan would be presented to Congress for action, of it would serve as only a partial guide for lawmakers on the politically sensitive subject. “We desperately need some immigration legislation,' Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said on Fox News earlier this month.  'It is finally time for us to step up and not only solve the crisis at the border, but do some changes to immigration laws that are sensible,' the Kentucky Republican added, saying it's time to end 'years of gridlock' on immigration matters. At this point though in the halls of the Congress, there is no indication that lawmakers will be voting on any immigration plan anytime soon. For obvious reasons, Democrats aren't interested in taking the lead for the President on immigration legislation, pointing back to early 2018, when a bipartisan Senate group seemingly reached an immigration deal which was acceptable to President Trump - only to watch him quickly tack away. 'The President put forth his criteria. He had the Senate Republicans and Democrats come together, proposed something to him and then he walked away from it,' said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Back in February 2018, the President's preferred immigration plan garnered only 39 votes, with 13 GOP Senators refusing to support Mr. Trump's nearly $100 billion package. That plan featured money to build a border wall, an end to chain migration, stopping a visa lottery, and a number of other immigration law changes desired by the President. But it won the votes of only three Democrats, mainly because it did not do enough to help younger illegal immigrant 'Dreamers' in the country under the DACA program. The House and Senate are currently out on a two week break for Easter; immigration legislation is not on the agenda in either legislative body at this point.