ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

clear-day
77°
Sunny
H 96° L 73°
  • clear-day
    77°
    Current Conditions
    Sunny. H 96° L 73°
  • clear-day
    93°
    Afternoon
    Sunny. H 96° L 73°
  • cloudy-day
    93°
    Evening
    Partly Cloudy. H 96° L 73°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest newscast

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest traffic report

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

The latest forecast

00:00 | 00:00

National Govt & Politics
Questions and Answers on the GOP health reform bill in Congress
Close

Questions and Answers on the GOP health reform bill in Congress

Questions and Answers on the GOP health reform bill in Congress
Photo Credit: Jamie Dupree

Questions and Answers on the GOP health reform bill in Congress

As Republicans moved ahead in Congress this week with a plan to overhaul the Obama health law, GOP leaders set out an ambitious schedule over the next few weeks that could see a showdown on the House floor later this month over a health care reform plan that has the strong backing of President Trump.

"We promised to repeal and replace Obamacare, and now we are one step closer to giving families relief from this collapsing law," said House Speaker Paul Ryan on Thursday.

As I reported on the health care story this week, it quickly became apparent that many voters aren't quite sure about the procedural details involved in this legislative effort - so let's try to answer a few of those questions about what happens next on health care.

1. What has happened so far in the Congress. If you weren't paying close attention, you might have missed the Monday night rollout of the House Republican health bill. The GOP wasted no time in getting that plan before two committees on Wednesday, and after burning the midnight oil, both the House Ways and Means Committee and the House Energy and Commerce Committee approved the plan on a party line vote. "Next the bill goes to the Budget Committee as part of an open, transparent process," Speaker Paul Ryan said. That will be next week.

2. Why don't we know the cost of the GOP program? In the rush to get their bill hammered out and through two House committees, Republicans did not wait for a "score" from the Congressional Budget Office. So, right now, not only don't we have an estimate on how this will impact the federal deficit, but there also are not official figures on how many people would gain or lose health insurance coverage. It looks like those figures will come out next week, about the time that the GOP bill goes to the House Budget Committee. Critics argued that Republicans probably won't like the CBO report.

3. Republicans going with a three phase health care plan. There will be three parts to the Republican effort to overhaul the Obama health law, and this is where it starts to get a bit confusing for those who don't eat, drink and breathe parliamentary procedure in the Congress. Part 1 for the GOP is the bill that went through two committees this week, in the process known as "budget reconciliation." Part 2 will be regulations and rules that can be changed by the Trump Administration in the Department of Health and Human Services that impact health insurance. And Part 3 will be all sorts of other legislative ideas on health that don't qualify for the reconciliation bill - but those could face a filibuster in the Senate.

4. Why are there going to be two different bills? As my old across-the-street neighbor Jane points out in her above tweet, the GOP is leaving certain things out of the bill that is moving through Congress right now. That's because the rules of "budget reconciliation" don't allow the GOP to include items like, selling insurance across state lines, full repeal of the individual and employer mandates, and much more. All of that has to go in the regular bill, which would need 60 votes to get past any filibuster by Democrats in the Senate. Let me say it again - the first bill just needs a regular majority, the second one can be blocked by filibuster. The first bill is more limited, but the second one can include anything related to health policy.

5. Now we get to the false story lines of recent days. I've heard it all since Monday. "The Democrats passed their bill entirely by reconciliation." No, they did not. "The Democrats didn't need 60 votes when they passed Obamacare." Yes, they did. "Why are the rules different for Republicans?" The rules are not different for the GOP health care plan. The playing field is the same. The Democrats had to operate under the same rules and restrictions in the Congress. The biggest difference between 2009 and 2017 is simple - the Democrats had 60 votes in the Senate. The Republicans only have 52. So, the GOP can pass the reconciliation bill, but they'll need help from Democrats on a broader health care policy measure.

Jamie Dupree
Close

health56

Jamie Dupree

6. The Democrats passed two health care bills. I don't blame most of you for not remembering this, but Democrats had to pass two bills to do their health care plan in 2009 and 2010. First, the Senate mustered 60 votes to overcome a GOP filibuster, and on Christmas Eve 2009 approved what turned into the Affordable Care Act. Then, after they lost their 60 vote Senate super majority when Scott Brown won in Massachusetts early the next year, they had to come up with another plan. So, Democrats pushed through a budget reconciliation measure that made additional - but limited - health care changes. That bill was titled, the "Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010." Both of those plans made it through Congress in March of 2010, and President Obama signed them into law. The Republicans are basically trying to do the same thing in 2017.

c9f363e5-975b-490e-9fb0-851508bbc08d{ "/Pub/p8/CmgSharedContent/2017/03/09/Images/WPIMAGE_cmgwsbradiojamiedupree_health58_11371.jpg?uuid=bkE8SjTNEemxKaMrYufZxg", "", "0370a33209954ed2961c1f969f27e166" "image" "" }

7. The GOP repeal bill in 2015 was not a full repeal. I don't care how many times you try to tell me otherwise. The 2015 bill that was approved in both the House and Senate, and then vetoed by President Obama was NOT a full repeal. It was a reconciliation bill. You cannot have a full repeal of the Obama health law under budget reconciliation. It cannot happen. It did not happen for the GOP. That was not a full repeal. So, when you hear conservative groups and conservative Republicans say they should just pass the 2015 bill - sure, the Congress could do that - but it is not a full repeal of the Obama health law.

8. But can't the GOP overrule the Senate Parliamentarian? I have heard this one way too many times already. This idea is sort of the nuclear option of the health care debate. Change the Parliamentarian, or just have the chair overrule the Parliamentarian, and change the precedents of the Senate. That means you don't have to follow the limited rules under budget reconciliation, so you don't have to follow the Byrd Rule, and anything can go into a reconciliation bill. Technically, that could happen - though I find it hard to believe that would be an option for the GOP in the Senate. But there are Republican members of the House and conservative groups pushing exactly that, raising the hopes of their supporters. I can only imagine their reaction if it was Democrats using that strategy.

9. How about some highlights from the bill. Instead of trying to list what's most important, I'll just include a one page set of bullet points that Republicans are handing out to lawmakers. You can sort through it to see if it really tells the full story - critics of the plan will certainly say it does not.

Jamie Dupree
Close

health54

Jamie Dupree

10. So what is the time line here?Let's give you an idea of what we may see on the GOP health care bill:

+ This week brought approval of the GOP plan in two House committees.

+ Week of March 13 - House Budget Committee votes on GOP health care reconciliation bill. And we probably get a CBO score.

+ Week of March 20 - The bill heads to the House Rules Committee, which sets the ground rules for debate on the floor. In the search for votes at this point, the Rules Committee could make some late changes, known as a "Manager's Amendment." (When the Democrats made late changes like that in 2009, Republicans hit the roof.)

+ You could have a vote in the House that week, or the week of March 27, depending on how much arm-twisting is needed before the Easter break.

+ The week of March 20 and/or March 27, you could also see House action on the "second" health care bill, which would include all sorts of health care policy ideas that are not included in the reconciliation bill. The GOP leadership can then turn to any fence sitters and say, "See? You voted to repeal and replace."

+ If the House approves the health care bill, it goes right to the Senate - where it might need a little more work before a floor vote, as some Republicans have signaled their opposition.

My bottom line right now? I know there are a lot of Republicans raising red flags about the bill. But the same thing happened in 2009 and 2010. And the Democrats pushed it through.

Chances are the GOP can only get the first bill through both the House and Senate, while a filibuster might stop a broader health policy measure. But who knows?

Stay tuned.

Read More

The Latest Headlines You Need To Know

  • A frightening scene unfolded in a Central Florida neighborhood Sunday as people watched a man allegedly force a woman and a baby into a car. >> Read more trending news  That man was arrested after police said he kidnapped his girlfriend and their baby around 2:30 p.m. in Orange County, then led officers on a chase. Orlando police said the chase began in the Carver Shores neighborhood and ended at South Street and Rogers Street, where the man crashed the car. A witness in the area saw the man get out of the car and believed he was surrendering, but instead he ran from police. Video the witness shot shows police and medics responding to the incident. Investigators said a witness saw the man grab his girlfriend by the hair and pull her into a car as she tried to escape several times. The man then allegedly sped off with her and their 1-year-old in the back seat. The car was later found by the Orange County Sheriff's Office helicopter. The man drove off again before he crashed into a ditch. “They were asking him to get out of the car with his hands up,” said a witness, who did not want to be identified. “He proceeded to get out of the car, seemed like he was going to put his hands up and then next thing we knew, he took off through the neighborhood.”  Police caught up to the man later and arrested him. Officers said the woman and child were not hurt.
  • As new legal battles brew over the right to abortion access nationwide, central Floridians are sharing their opinions on recently passed legislation in other states. Hundreds of people gathered Sunday at Lake Eola Park in downtown Orlando, to send a message to Florida's lawmakers.  Representatives said even though abortion restrictions have not passed the legislature this session in Florida, that doesn't mean it's not going to happen next session.  “Having such an incredible crowd here today reflects the majority of Americans supporting access to an abortion and speaks to lawmakers across the state of Florida that if you try to follow suit with Alabama, Missouri and Georgia, these folks are going to be at your office,” Rep. Anna Eskamani said.
  • A new water park is coming to Kissimmee, and you have the chance to check it out before everyone else does. The 'preview days' for Island H2O Live! which is at the Margaritaville Resort Orlando start on June 5th and last until June 20th. The water park is located just off U.S. 192 on 3230 Inspiration Drive.  During these preview days, you can get $5 off a daily pass or save $20 on an annual pass and get one for $69.99 rather than paying $89.99. Be aware that daily passes must be bought at the water park ticket windows only.  Island H2O Live! has a 'social media' theme that is integrated into the park's attractions. Like the 'Tag Shack' cocktail bar or the 'Hashtag Heights' family tube ride. It also allows you to use unique technology like waterproof wristbands that you can link to an app that allows you to interact with some of the things on certain rides. This new water park has over 20 different experiences for you and your family to check out.  Also, here's a fun fact: its located within walking distance of Sunset Walk, the resort's shopping and entertainment district, so if water parks aren't your thing or you feel like doing a little bit of shopping after taking a swim, you can do that too.  Side note: Since this is a new water park, that means of course they need people to fill up their full time positions. If that sounds interesting, you can go to the job fair on May 28th from 9am to 4pm at the water park. They say they plan to hire on the spot.  Though the preview days have been announced, there is no official start date to when the park opens. If you would like to learn more about it, you can check out the website here:  https://www.islandh2olive.com/
  • As you spend this Memorial Day weekend celebrating with your friends and family, its important to remember that the freedom many of our nation's heroes have fought and died for always comes at a price. Well in honor of the occasion, as you would expect, here are some freebies and deals through Memorial Day that veterans, active duty and retired military members and their families can take advantage of( standard disclaimer: some locations may not be participating, so its important to always contact them ahead of time):  Ace Hardware: While supplies last, you can get a free 8 by 12 inch flag on May 25th.  AAA: Through Tuesday, you can get free tipsy low service.  Apple: They have special offers on their products, including their Apple Care Protection Plans.  Cinemark Theatres: It varies by location, but if you show your military ID, you get a special discount.  Delta Airlines: Military personnel get a free bag check.  Home Depot and Lowe's: Veterans and their families get 10 percent off. Just show your ID  Hooters: Show your military ID on May 27th and you can get free entrees including 10 free boneless wings, Buffalo chicken salad, Hooters Burger or a Buffalo Chicken sandwich.  Longhorn Steakhouse: Check out the coupon below to get a free appetizer or dessert when you get an entree through May 26th.  https://www.longhornsteakhouse.com/customer-service/coupons/free-app-or-dessert-with-2-entrees-lh74-052319?cmpid=br:lh_ag:ie_ch:eml_ca:LHQ419L52COUP_dt:20190523_vs:1NV_in:Specials_pl:image01_FreeApp_rd:9bc86910b47843f7a15abeafd3d66e28  Sea World and Busch Gardens: The Waves of Honor program gives free entry to military families and members with their ID through December 31st. TGI Fridays: Check out the coupon to a free entree when you buy one and two drinks from May 25-27.  https://share.rivet.works/fridays
  • An ex-Magic Kingdom worker from Clermont has been arrested, accused of trying to set up a sexual encounter with an 8 year old girl.  According to the United States Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Florida, Frederick M. Pohl Jr.  sent inappropriate pictures of himself to what he believed was the 8 year old girl and talked online with her and her father in order to arrange a meeting. When he arrived at an Orlando hotel that they were supposed to meet at, Pohl was arrested by an undercover federal agent who was the one posing as the girl he was talking to.  According to the submitted criminal complaint, Pohl was in possession of condoms and a child sized pink dress. While the Middle District did confirm that he was an employee at the Magic Kingdom, they did not say what his role was.

Washington Insider

  • With June 4, 2019 marking the 100th anniversary of the approval by Congress of a constitutional change which guaranteed women the ability to vote in the United States, a look back at the final debates in the House and Senate showcased dire predictions that giving women the franchise would bring a rush to socialism in American and spur racial problems in the South. 'It will not only add to the growth of socialism, but will likewise contribute to the upbuilding of femininism and Bolshevism in America,' thundered Rep. Frank Clark, a Florida Democrat who bitterly opposed the women's suffrage amendment. 'Every Socialist and every Bolshevist throughout the land wherever you find him is an ardent advocate of woman suffrage, and he wants it by Federal amendment,' Clark said on the House floor, as he also warned the change would stir racial troubles in the South.  'Make this amendment a part of the Federal Constitution and the negro women of the Southern States, under the tutelage of the fast-growing socialistic element of our common country, will become fanatical on the subject of voting and will reawaken in the negro men an intense and not easily quenched desire to again become a political factor,' said Clark, who led opposition to the constitutional change. While Clark's arguments did not sway the debate, there were clear sectional differences, as the House voted 304-90 in favor of the proposed constitutional change to allow women to vote. As debate concluded in the House on May 21, 1919, supporters said it was simply time for women to be allowed to vote in every state of the Union. 'I want to congratulate the good women who fought the good fight all these years, and who now see the dawn of the day of final victory,' said Rep. Frank Mondell, the House Republican Leader from Wyoming, a state which allowed women to vote when it was still a territory. 'When I came here the voice of the suffragist was like that of John the Baptist crying in the wilderness,' said former House Speaker 'Champ' Clark, a Democrat from Missouri. 'I think my wife and my daughter are as capable of voting as most men in this country are,' the Democratic Leader said to applause. But for others, what would ultimately become the 19th Amendment - referred to in debate as the 'Susan B. Anthony Amendment' - was not something to celebrate, as many southern lawmakers eyed the effort with derision and suspicion, with the Civil War, Reconstruction, and states' rights bubbling in the political background. 'Is suffrage such a question as should be snatched from the control of the States and lodged in a rapidly centralizing government?' asked Rep. Eugene Black, a Democrat from Texas, as a number of lawmakers in both parties said the individual states should decide who votes, and who does not. 'Under the fifteenth amendment, not only the negro, for whom it was adopted, but the sons of every other race under the sun may vote in any State in the Union, provided they or their ancestors have once been naturalized,' argued Rep. Rufus Hardy, a Democrat from Texas. 'What evils may yet come of the fifteenth amendment only the future may unfold,' Hardy said, as he drew applause in advocating states' rights, and denouncing federal decisions about who could vote. 'It is a privilege to be granted or withheld at the pleasure of the States,' said Rep. Clark of Florida. But some urged southern lawmakers to reconsider, asking the 'gentlemen of Dixie' to give their mothers a chance to vote for them. Several weeks later, as the Senate vote on the 19th amendment approached in early June, the debate became more testy - more focused on race - and the right of states to determine who can vote. 'When it says that there shall be no restriction of the suffrage on account of sex, it means the female sex, and means the millions upon millions of Negro women in the South,' said Sen. Ellison Smith, a Democrat from South Carolina. The argument from southern Senators was simple - the states should decide who votes, not the federal government.  It was a preview of the battles to come during the Civil Rights era. 'Mr. President, it is not a question today as to whether the women of American should have the right to vote,' said Sen. Oscar Underwood, a Democrat from Alabama.  “It is a question of whether, in the end, our Government shall live.” Supporters of the amendment openly acknowledged that black women in the South probably would not be allowed to vote by southern states - precisely in the same way that hurdles had been placed in the way of black Americans voting in the states of the former Confederacy - a charge that left southern Senators like Smith aggravated. 'I have heard it flippantly remarked by those who propose to vote for this amendment, 'You found a way to keep the Negro man from voting and you will find away to keep the unworthy Negro woman from voting,' Smith said on the Senate floor, as he denounced how the South had been 'deluged by an alien and unfit race.' “You went specifically after the Negro men in the fifteenth amendment,” Smith said in Senate debate.  “Now you go specifically after the Negro and white women in this amendment.” On the floor, Smith and other opponents of the amendment pushed back hard on the race question, as Senators sparred over old wounds and scars left by the Fifteenth Amendment and Reconstruction. 'Those of us from the South, where the preponderance of the Negro vote jeopardized our civilization, have maintained that the fifteenth amendment was a crime against our civilization,' Smith said. 'The Senator knows full well that the fifteenth amendment embodied the color question,' said Sen. Irvine Lenroot, a Republican from Wisconsin, 'the Senator knows just as well that there is no color question at all embodied in this amendment. It relates only to sex.' 'The discussion here upon the floor yesterday makes it perfectly apparent that in part at least, in a certain section of this country, this proposed amendment will be a dead letter,' acknowledged Sen. James Wadsworth, a Republican from New York. Wadsworth and others were proven correct, as it took many years for black Americans to get around the poll tax and other means of stopping them from voting. “Oh, the white man votes because you are careful to apply tests which do not apply to the white man,' Senator William Borah, a Republican of Idaho, said to Senators from the South. 'You pick out those tests which exclude the Negro and write them into your law, and that excludes the Negro.' In an exchange with Senator John Williams, a Mississippi Democrat, Borah said, “the Negro does not vote (in the South) because he is black. That is the only crime which he has committed.” Just before the final vote in the Senate, Democrat Edward Gay of Louisiana rose on the Senate floor, making one last call to allow the states to have the final say on whether women should vote. 'I predict that there are 13 States that will never ratify the amendment which the Congress of the United State is about to present to the American people,' Gay said. Gay was wrong, as the amendment was ratified 14 months later in August of 1920. But it took years for many southern states to ratify the 19th Amendment to the Constitution: + Virginia - February 21, 1952 + Alabama - September 8, 1953 + Florida - May 13, 1969 + South Carolina - July 1, 1969 + Georgia - February 20, 1970 + Louisiana - June 11, 1970 + North Carolina - May 6, 1971 + Mississippi - March 22, 1984